Researchers tested Adele, Enya, and Coldplay against an unknown instrumental track, and it won on relaxation, just not for the reason the viral version of this story claims

A few years ago, a spa brand commissioned an experiment that sounds almost too simple. Give people a stressful puzzle, wire them up to sensors, and play them a lineup of songs people already consider relaxing. Adele. Enya. Coldplay. A handful of other tracks people commonly describe as calming.

Then slip in one more, an eight-minute instrumental piece by a British ambient group almost nobody outside a niche audience had heard of.

That unknown track won, though not by nearly as much as the version of this story that circulates online. It scored a 73 percent relaxation rating in the study, an edge of about 11 percent over the other songs tested and 6 percent over a massage used as a comparison condition.

I find that result more interesting than the headline number, because it isn’t really a story about which song is “best.” It’s a story about what actually calms a nervous system, and how different that is from what we assume calms it.

The study behind the number

The research came from Mindlab International, commissioned by the spa brand Radox and developed with sound therapist Lyz Cooper, who co-created the track “Weightless” by Marconi Union. Twenty participants, all women between 18 and 61, listened to each track for three minutes while sensors tracked heart rate, blood pressure, and breathing, with stress induced by separate puzzle-based distracters between listening sessions rather than during them. Across the tracks tested, “Weightless” produced the highest relaxation score.

Worth saying plainly: this was commercially commissioned research, not an independent academic study, and the “65 percent anxiety reduction” figure that circulates in most write-ups of it doesn’t actually appear in the report. It looks like a mash-up with a separate, older Mindlab experiment on stress and tea drinking. What the study shows on its own terms is a real but modest edge, in a small sample, over both the comparison songs and a massage condition.

What still makes it notable is that the track beat songs with strong emotional associations, artists people already love, already feel something about, using something built with none of that cultural weight behind it. It won mostly on structure.

Why familiarity isn’t the same as calm

We tend to assume the music that moves us emotionally is the same music that regulates us physiologically. Those are actually two different effects, and they don’t always overlap.

A song like an Adele ballad can produce a real emotional response, often an intense one. But intensity and regulation aren’t the same thing. An emotionally stirring song can activate memory, longing, even grief, alongside whatever calming quality it has. That’s a rich experience, but it isn’t necessarily a nervous-system reset.

“Weightless” was built differently. Reporting on the track describes a deliberate arrangement: a starting tempo close to resting heart rate, a gradual slowdown, and a lack of sudden shifts or emotional peaks. Nothing in it asks your body to feel something specific. It just gives your body less to react to.

This lines up with something I keep running into in my own research on emotion regulation. Nostalgic, familiar music can be deeply calming too, but through a different route, it works by association, by reminding the body it has been safe before. That’s a memory-based calm. What “Weightless” produces looks more like a structural one, achieved through a track with no memory attached to it at all.

What the track is actually doing

This is where the mechanism gets interesting rather than just anecdotal. Slow, predictable tempo appears to help entrain heart rate and breathing toward a slower, steadier pace. No abrupt key changes, no big swells, nothing your attention has to brace for.

Contrast that with most popular music, which is built around anticipation and release, a chorus that pays off a verse, a drop that pays off a build. That structure is emotionally satisfying, but it’s also, in a small way, activating. Your nervous system is tracking tension and resolution, even if you’re only half aware of it.

An eight-minute track with almost no structural tension is asking something different of you. It’s not building toward anything. There’s nothing to wait for, which means there’s nothing for your attention to grip.

Where the popular version of this story goes wrong

The way this study usually gets repeated online is as a kind of trivia fact: “scientists found the most relaxing song ever, cuts anxiety by 65 percent.” That framing treats a small, commercially funded comparison as a universal, independently verified hack, one track that should work on everyone the same way, which the report itself never claimed.

A more accurate reading is more limited, and more useful. Musical response is shaped by personal history, culture, and association, so no single track can be the most calming thing for every listener. What the study really demonstrates is a mechanism (low tension, high predictability, gradual tempo reduction), not a magic number. You could apply that mechanism to other music entirely and likely get a related effect.

A separate, independently run trial found something related: patients listening to music before a minor nerve-block procedure reported anxiety levels similar to those given a standard anti-anxiety medication, though patients in the medication group still reported higher overall satisfaction with the procedure. This isn’t medical advice, and no one should treat music as a substitute for a recommended clinical intervention, but it’s a useful data point on how far a low-tension soundscape can go, and where its limits are.

The role of attention in why this works

Anxiety often has an attentional component that gets overlooked. A racing mind isn’t just feeling something, it’s also scanning, checking, anticipating what might go wrong next. That scanning takes real cognitive effort, whether or not you notice it happening.

A highly predictable soundscape gives that scanning process less to do. If nothing in the auditory environment is surprising, part of your attention that would otherwise stay on alert can stand down. That’s a different route to calm than emotional catharsis. It’s closer to reducing input than releasing feeling.

This matters for how people think about creative and emotional life more broadly. We tend to assume more meaning, more emotional intensity, more resonance is always the better creative choice. Sometimes the opposite quality, restraint, repetition, low stimulation, is doing the actual psychological work.

Sovereign Mind lens

Ideapod’s Sovereign Mind framework separates the story we tell about a creative experience from what’s actually happening underneath it.

Unlearning: the assumption that whatever moves you emotionally must also be what calms you physiologically. Those two effects are worth telling apart, especially when you’re choosing something to listen to specifically to come down from stress.

Restoration: rebuilding a felt sense of the difference between emotional intensity and nervous-system regulation, so you can choose music (or silence) deliberately, based on what your body needs in that moment rather than habit.

Defense: resisting the version of this research that gets sold as a universal trick. No single track fixes anxiety for everyone, and treating “the most relaxing song” as a shortcut can quietly replace your own attention to what actually settles you.

What this suggests for how we use music

None of this is an argument against emotionally rich music. Songs that move you matter, and they do something valuable that a purely structural, low-tension track can’t replicate. The two aren’t in competition.

But it’s worth separating your listening choices by what you’re actually trying to do. If you want to feel something, emotionally loaded music with strong associations makes sense. If you’re trying to bring a racing nervous system down before sleep, before a stressful task, or in the middle of an anxious stretch, something closer to the “Weightless” model, slow, predictable, structurally quiet, may serve a different and more specific purpose.

In my own writing routines, the music that makes me feel something (an old favorite) is rarely the music that actually settles a racing morning. That’s music for company, not the tempo-and-breath work a track like “Weightless” is built for.

Picture of Nato Lagidze

Nato Lagidze

Nato began writing for Ideapod in 2021 and now serves as its Editor-in-Chief, guiding the publication’s editorial direction around independent thinking, self-awareness, and ways people make sense of their lives. With an academic background in psychology, she investigates emotional bonds people form with places. She dreams of creating an uplifting documentary one day, inspired by her experiences with strangers.

Creative Life

Researchers tested Adele, Enya, and Coldplay against an unknown instrumental track, and it won on relaxation, just not for the reason the viral version of this story claims

Constraints produce better creative work than unlimited freedom, and the research has been saying so long enough that the surprise is how rarely anyone acts on it

Personality tests have limited ability to predict actual behavior, and the research has said so for decades, which has done nothing to reduce their popularity

We are born creative geniuses, and the famous NASA study tells only half the story

born creative genius

What reading every day actually does to the mind

Scientists have now formally concluded that ChatGPT is not conscious — and in the same breath left open the possibility that the bee outside your window might be

Theme
Read