I’m 36, still single, and finally figured out why

Editor’s note: This article was originally published in 2018 and was updated in April 2026 to reflect Ideapod’s current editorial standards and The Sovereign Mind Framework.

I’ve been single for nearly all of my adult life, am still single, and I finally figured out what the problem is.

I used to believe the reason was because I hadn’t met the right person yet. I believed that all I had to do was keep enjoying life, focus on my passion, identify the qualities I was looking for and soon enough I would attract the perfect partner.

I now know this approach to life doesn’t make much sense. The way to attract the perfect partner into your life is completely different than what most people believe. Life isn’t a fairy tale. There are no easy solutions, despite what the law of attraction gurus will tell you.

The brutal truth I discovered is that the problem is me, not the women I’ve been dating.

I knew this as soon as I came across “attachment theory” in an article by Mark Manson which describes the nature of emotional attachment between humans, and the four types of people in relationships.

I’ll share the types of people according to attachment theory below, but first I’ll explain the problem I was facing.

Living my whole adult life as a single man

Every time I meet someone new, the same thing happens. I feel incredible excitement about the possibility of sparks flying. I spend some time with them. The usual sinking feeling in the pit of my stomach returns. I conclude that she’s “not quite right” and move on to the next person.

Week after week, month after month and year after year this same thing happens. I continue to succeed at my external focuses in life, but don’t have any success at building any kind of emotional and loving connection with a romantic partner.

The truth is that I’m 36 years old and have lived almost all of my adult life as a single man.

Recently, I read about attachment theory and came to the sudden and painful realization that the problem isn’t the women I’ve been dating. I’m the problem. I’m the “avoidant type.” And I now know what to do to live a better life.

4 types of people in relationships, according to attachment theory

As Manson explains, attachment theory began in the 1950s and has since amassed a sizeable body of research behind it. In short, researchers have found that the way in which infants get their needs met by their parents determines their “attachment strategy” throughout their lives. Your attachment strategy likely explains why your relationships have succeeded or failed, the manner in which they did and why you’re attracted to who you’re attracted to.

The four attachment strategies people adopt are: secure, anxious, avoidant and anxious-avoidant.

1) Secure: people who are comfortable displaying interest and affection. These people are both comfortable showing affection towards their loved ones while also being alone and independent. They can prioritize what’s important in their relationships and can draw clear boundaries. Secure people can accept rejection when it happens and can also be loyal during tough times. People who are secure are the best people to have a relationship with.

It turns out that 59% of the population are of the secure type, according to research. I used to think I was one of them, but learning about type 3 helped me see that I’m not. Secure attachment is developed in childhood by infants who regularly get their needs met, as well as receive ample quantities of love and affection.

2) Anxious: people who are often nervous and stressed about their relationships. These people need constant reassurance and affection from their partners. They are uncomfortable being alone, and often succumb to abusive relationships. Anxious people have trouble trusting their partners. This is the girl who constantly wants to check their boyfriend’s messages and the guy who follows his girlfriend to work out of fear she’s going to meet someone else.

Anxious attachments are developed early in life from infants who receive love and care unpredictably from their parents.

3) Avoidant: extremely independent, comfortable being alone and uncomfortable with intimacy. These people have massive problems with commitment and can often rationalize themselves out of any intimate situation. They are highly sensitive to feelings of being “crowded” or “suffocated” in a relationship, and in every relationship they always have an exit strategy. Avoidant types of people often create a lifestyle that supports their constant independence.

It’s the man who works 80 hours a week and gets frustrated when his partner wants to spend some quality time together on the weekend. It’s the woman who dates many partners over a number of years, telling them all she “doesn’t want anything serious.” It’s also me, and before coming across these attachment types I had absolutely no idea that I was creating the problem.

According to research, this attachment strategy is developed in childhood by infants who only get some of their needs met while the rest are neglected. It’s not always the case — personally, I was fortunate to grow up in a happy and loving family, but I did have some challenging relationships in my early years of adulthood which set the course for my avoidant behaviors.

4) Anxious-avoidant: the “fearful type” who bring the worst of both worlds. These types of people are not only afraid of emotional commitment and connection. They also lash out at people who try to get close to them. Anxious-avoidant types often spend large amounts of time alone, but they’re miserable in doing so. When they’re not alone, they’re often in dysfunctional and abusive relationships.

Only a small percentage of people are anxious-avoidant types, and they typically have a multitude of other emotional problems in other areas of their life. Anxious-avoidant types develop from abusive or terribly negligent childhoods.

What happens when different attachment types date each other?

According to attachment theory, different configurations of relationship types coming together have different impacts on the nature of the relationship itself.

Secure types are capable of dating both anxious and avoidant types. They’re comfortable enough with themselves to give anxious types the reassurance they need and to give avoidant types the space they need without feeling threatened themselves.

Anxious and avoidant types often end up in relationships with one another. This is because avoidant types are so good at putting off others that it’s only the anxious types that stick around. And the lack of emotional availability of the avoidant types ends up triggering the anxiety of the anxious type, which keeps them coming back for more.

Anxious-avoidants often date each other, or the least secure of the anxious types or avoidant types. These relationships are often abusive or negligent.

This theory proves that people can change over time. Secure types can help anxious or avoidant people “level up” over the course of their relationship, but unfortunately, the converse is also true with avoidants and anxious people also able to “bring down” their secure partners.

What am I going to do about my attachment type?

The first point I want to make is that I don’t think a theory can perfectly describe who I am. I also don’t see myself as a “flawed individual.” Rather, I’m using the insights from attachment theory to help guide me in creating some personal shifts.

As Manson points out, everybody has elements of each attachment type. But we usually end up demonstrating behaviors of one particular attachment more than others over time.

I know that I have elements of a secure type, along with moments of anxiety. Yet if I’m honest with myself, my perpetual single life can be explained by the avoidant type in attachment theory.

In my case, I’ve decided to embark on a journey of addressing the parts of myself that result in my avoidant behaviors. I don’t think I’m a bad person, and I don’t believe there’s anything wrong with me. However, in my view, a natural part of life is to understand that there is always room for personal improvement. I also believe I’m capable of changing the circumstances in my life and becoming a person more secure with intimacy and companionship.

I would like to experience a committed and intimate relationship. My first commitment is to myself and creating the change within. My second commitment is to share my own personal journey with the Ideapod community so that others can join me in my process of personal transformation:

  • How I treat others in a relationship is a mirror of how I treat myself.
  • What I want from others in a relationship is what I need to give myself.
  • The most important relationship I can cultivate is the relationship I have with myself.
  • By becoming secure with the relationship I have with myself, I’ll have secure relationships with others.

It seems pretty simple when I write it out above. But for me, it’s an incredibly profound insight.

I’m now consciously aware of the practices I’m engaging in every day in developing the relationship I have with myself. Already I’m noticing some powerful shifts in my life. I’m still single, but I’m much more secure in my relationships with others. I also feel much more confident in the kind of person I would be in a loving and intimate relationship.

Whether this new understanding of myself will result in an intimate relationship doesn’t concern me so much. I’m already much happier this way. I respect myself and love myself. Life is already changing quite profoundly.

The Sovereign Mind lens

Understanding attachment theory through The Sovereign Mind framework reveals deeper layers to relationship patterns that often go unexamined.

Unlearning: Many of us inherit cultural scripts about “finding the one” or believing that love should feel effortless, without questioning how these romantic myths might mask our own emotional unavailability or unrealistic expectations.

Restoration: Building genuine intimacy requires the ability to stay present with uncomfortable emotions rather than automatically retreating into familiar patterns of avoidance or anxiety when vulnerability arises.

Defense: Recognizing our attachment style helps us distinguish between genuine incompatibility and the defensive stories we tell ourselves to maintain emotional distance when relationships start to feel real.

How to start building secure attachment patterns

If you’re like me and wondering why you’re still single, understanding your attachment style is only the beginning of meaningful change.

  • Notice your exit strategies: Pay attention to how you mentally prepare to leave before relationships even get serious. What stories do you tell yourself about why someone isn’t “quite right”?
  • Stay present with discomfort: When you feel that familiar urge to pull away or create distance, pause and breathe through the sensation rather than immediately acting on it.
  • Practice small vulnerabilities: Start sharing slightly more personal thoughts or feelings than feels comfortable, even in friendships, to build your tolerance for emotional exposure.
  • Examine your relationship with yourself: Notice how you speak to yourself during difficult moments. The harshness or kindness you show yourself often mirrors how you’ll treat others.
  • Question your timeline expectations: Challenge beliefs about how quickly intimacy should develop or how relationships should “feel” in the early stages.
  • Seek feedback from trusted friends: Ask people close to you what they’ve noticed about your relationship patterns. Sometimes we have blind spots that others can see clearly.
Picture of Gabriel Spencer

Gabriel Spencer

Gabriel Spencer is a visionary writer with a keen interest in the intersection of technology and human behavior, particularly focusing on the implications of artificial intelligence on society. A former software developer turned digital anthropologist, Gabriel uniquely combines technical expertise with cultural insights. His passion for sustainable technology drives his research and writing, as he seeks to uncover how digital tools can foster global sustainability and ethical innovation. An avid hiker and amateur photographer, Gabriel often draws metaphors from nature to explain complex technological concepts, making them accessible and engaging for his audience. Through his work, Gabriel challenges his readers to rethink their relationship with technology, advocating for a balance that enhances both personal well-being and societal good.

Social World

How to recognize when a relationship is costing you more than it’s giving you

The patterns narcissists rely on only work when you don’t know what to look for

How algorithmic feeds are quietly training your nervous system to stay agitated

Why the most persuasive people in your life are rarely the most honest

The hidden psychology behind why disagreement feels like rejection

Psychologists identify the key habits that make romantic relationships last a lifetime

Theme
Read